275 / 370
273
a
V\VWHPDWLFNpKR ]OHSãRYDQLD WHMWR RWi]N\ SUtOHåLWRVĢ GRVLDKQXĢ NRPSDUDWtYQH
priaznivé postavenie a
]tVNDĢ Y
medzi
QiURGQRP NRQWH[WH NRQNXUHQþQ~ YêKRGX
V
SUtSDGH ]Y\ãQêFK GYRFK GLPHQ]Lt VSDGDM~FLFK GR SRGPLHQN\ QD SRGQLNDQLH
Ä9OiGQH SROLWLN\ SULRULW\ SRGSRUD ³ EROR KRGQRWHQLH VWDYX D
dynamiky
v
VOHGRYDQRP REGREt WDN ] DEVRO~WQHKR DNR DM NRPSDUDWtYQHKR KĐDGLVND YHĐP
i
SRGREQp 'LPHQ]LD FKDUDNWHUL]XM~FD SULRULWL]iFLX SRGSRU\ QRYêFK D
UDVW~FLFK
ILULHP QD ~URYQL YOiGQ\FK SROLWtN % Y\Ni]DOD Y
URNX KRGQRWHQLH YêUD]QH
v
QHJDWtYQHM þDVWL KRGQRWLDFHM ãNiO\
VNyULQJRYpKR ERGX NWRUpPX
SUHGFKiG]DO
NDåGRURþQê SRNO
es
v
RERFK SUHGFKiG]DM~FLFK URNRFK
V
PHG]LQiURGQRP NRQWH[WH YćDND QHJDWtYQHPX VWDYX D
dynamike v porovnaní
s
SRPHUQH SULD]QLYêP VWDYRP D SR]LWtYQRX G\QDPLNRX RERFK SRURYQiYDFtFK
VNXStQ 6ORYHQVNR Y\Ni]DOR NRPSDUDWtYQH YêUD]QH ]Op SRVWDYHQLH V GUDPDWLFNêP
]DRVWiYDQtP ]D SULHPHUQêP KRGQRWHQtP NUDMtQ (XUyS\ DNR DM QDMY\VSHOHMãtFK
HNRQRPtN 3RGREQH GLPHQ]LD NWRUi FKDUDNWHUL]XMH SULRULWL]iFLX SRGSRU\ QRYêFK
a
UDVW~FLFK ILULHP QD ~URYQL SROLWtN UHJLRQiOQHM D NRPXQiOQHM VDPRVSUiY\ %
bola v roku 2013 hodnot
HQi YêUD]QH QHJDWtYQH
VNyULQJRYpKR ERGX D
to
SUHGRYãHWNêP Y G{VOHGNX SRNOHVX KRGQRWHQLD RSURWL SUHGFKiG]DM~FLP GYRP
rokom. Porovnanie s
NUDMLQDPL (XUyS\ DNR DM NUDMLQDPL NWRUêFK UR]YRM MH ]DORåHQê
QD LQRYiFLiFK QDSRYHGi R
YêUD]QRP ]DRVWiYDQt QDãH
j krajiny v
PHG]LQiURGQRP
kontexte, a to v
G{VOHGNX WDN NYDOLWDWtYQH KRUãLHKR KRGQRWHQLD DNR DM MHKR SUHSDGX
YćDND QHSULD]QLYHM G\QDPLNH &HONRYR QD ]iNODGH XYHGHQêFK SR]QDWNRY PRåQR
NRQãWDWRYDĢ åH SULRULWL]iFLD SRGSRU\ QRYêFK D
UDVW~FLFK ILULHP QD YãHWNêFK
~URYQLDFK YHUHMQêFK SROLWtN WHGD QD ~URYQL YOiGQHM UHJLRQiOQHM L
NRPXQiOQHM MH
z
DEVRO~WQHKR L NRPSDUDWtYQHKR KĐDGLVND QHGRVWDWRþQi .êP H[SHUWL QD 6ORYHQVNX
YQtPDM~ H[LVWXM~FX PLHUX SULRULWL]iFLH SRGQLNDQLD UHVS MHM DEVHQFLX DNR
SUHNiåNX Y
kraj
LQiFK (XUyS\ L
v
QDMY\VSHOHMãtFK HNRQRPLNiFK VYHWD MH SRGSRUD
QRYêFK D
UDVW~FLFK ILULHP Y
YHUHMQêFK SROLWLNiFK Y\ããRX SULRULWRX .URN\
k
]OHSãRYDQLX SRGQLNDWHĐVNpKR SURVWUHGLD QD 6ORYHQVNX E\ SUHWR PDOL VPHURYDĢ
k
RGVWUiQHQLX WRKWR QHSULD]QLYpKR VWDYX Y
na
ãRP NRQWH[WH
Graf 5.9: Hodnotenie dimenzií podmienky „Vládne politiky (priority,
podpora)“ v
URNRFK Då
Zdroj: Dáta GEM 2013, 2012 a 2011, vlastné spracovanie autorov
2,09
2,34
2,15
2,09
2,17
2,14
1,86
1,92
1,91
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
B01
B02
B03
2011
2012
2013